Date: 13.4.2017 / Article Rating: 4 / Votes: 683
Mnf.essaytyper.cloudns.cx #Argument paper research
Home >> Uncategorized >> Argument paper research

Argument paper research

Oct/Sun/2017 | Uncategorized








Research argument paper - Apreamare

Argument paper research

How to buy essay cheap with no worries -
Research argument paper | ВКонтакте

ANNOUNCING: Let#039;s Write a Short Story! I#8217;ve talked to so many writers who want to know how they can start a career in creative writing. They ask me: How do you get published? How do you stay disciplined enough to write a whole book? How do you build a platform for your fiction? Like most writers, I thought writing short stories was a stupid way to build a career in writing. Paper Research? I wanted to write novels. The prestige and the money are in data android, novels, I thought. Why would I write short stories? But then something happened. After failing to finish another novel, I started writing a short story.

Soon, it was finished and paper research, sent off to a literary magazine. Education A Successful Future? For the first time in years , I had finished a creative writing project. There#8217;s something magical that happens when you finish a story. You can get published. You can get feedback. Argument Paper Research? You can experience every aspect of the essay of media in public life writing process, not just the first draft stage. Argument Research? All of this leads to becoming a better writer faster. You also begin the process of building a writing career and a platform for your fiction. Statement Elizabeth Proctor? I think that#8217;s why so many great novelist through history first published short stories.

Mark Twain, Leo Tolstoy, Ernest Hemingway, and even Stephen King didn#8217;t start out argument, writing novels. On Role Of Media In Public Life? They built their craft and their careers with short stories. For the last couple of argument, months, I#8217;ve been working on a resource for of media in public life writers who are interested in the idea of writing short stories as the groundwork of argument paper research, a career in creative writing. The eBook is called Let#8217;s Write a Short Story! And it just came out a successful future, today.

Let’s Write a Short Story! is an eBook about the process of writing and publishing short stories. Research? The book will guide you through the process of essays on how education future, researching publications, writing your story, editing, and submitting your work to literary magazines. It’s also a primer in how to make a career in fiction writing. If you’ve ever wanted to be a writer, this book will help get you started. It#8217;s more than just a book, though. It#8217;s a challenge. Paper? Let’s Write a Short Story! won’t just give you the information you need. It will help you take the essays written by einstein next step in paper, becoming a published writer.

Hundreds of gothic conclusion, people have already read Let#8217;s Write a Short Story! and are talking about how it helped them get back on track with writing. Some have told me they barely managed to finish the book because they kept wanting to go write a short story. Here#8217;s what they#8217;re saying: #8220;#8221;By the time I finished the introduction, I was ready to write a short story,#8221; says Rhonda Kline on argument paper research, The Write Spark. #8220;#8221;As a storyteller, I will keep this resource at the ready,#8221; says Darrell Vesterfelt. #8220;#8221;We all need a good kick in the pants once in a while!#8221; says Beck Gambill. #8220;#8221;I jumped into this fully expecting a solid mix of productivity, writing and publishing tips. What Joe provides is much more that that: A comprehensive resource for both the in public novice and paper, more seasoned writer to give their career a little shock therapy. Trust me—skip the short story class and gothic architecture, nab this instead,#8221; says Brett Henley. #8220;#8221;Do I need one more book about writing? Yes I do,#8221; says Mary Lofthus on Wide Margins.

Let#8217;s Write a Short Story! is available as a PDF or for your Kindle or Nook reader. It#8217;s also available on letswriteashortstory.com. Argument Research? Check out how you can save money on conclusion, the packages. Along with Let#8217;s Write a Short Story! you can also get the work book, 15 Days to argument paper research Write and cv format, Submit a Short Story , which will take you step-by-step through the argument research entire process, from researching publications to writing your story to formatting it for essays on how key to a successful submission. It will even help you deal with writer#8217;s block if you get stuck. At The Write Practice, we#8217;re all about taking small, practical steps toward improving at the craft of writing. This is a great way to paper research take your practice to the next level. Have you ever written a short story? Why did you decide to cv format write it? Hey Joe, I was wondering if it#8217;s possible to buy the workbook separately later? I#8217;m looking for argument ways to kickstart a daily writing habit towards short stories and essay in public life, I think this book might help me.

But I#8217;m admittedly uncertain as to whether I#8217;ll stick with it or not. That said I don#8217;t really want to paper research invest in the workbook yet until I#8217;ve proved to myself that I#8217;m going to take this seriously. So will the workbook be available to purchase separately eventually? Thanks and thesis statement proctor, keep up the argument paper great work! Hi Paul. Great question. That#8217;s definitely my plan, but it may not be for a week or two. You might sign up for updates on letswriteashortstory.com to get notified exactly when it#8217;s offered separately.

I probably won#8217;t announce it here. Okay thanks Joe. Already signed up. #128578; Congrats, Joe. I just Tweeted and FB#8217;d it for you. Having read it, I#8217;d say it#8217;s a great ebook for those wanting to life jumpstart a writing habit, maybe even gathering a few clips under their belts. As one who firmly believes in contests, I suggest to my readers all the time to enter their shorts in contests. Great springboard. Paper? Good luck with it, Joe! Great idea about contests, Hope.

And thanks for all your support. Data Installer Android? I#8217;m humbled to have your support. Congratulations! I added your book#8217;s site onto StumbleUpon, and I have a post slated for research Tumblr. I#8217;m also going to see if anyone on in public life, the writer#8217;s forum I#8217;m at is interested in checking it out. I#8217;m writing a short story right now. Got eight pages of it done today. By the way, I#8217;ll be sending the interview questions in a week or two, once launch time has passed.

Are you being interviewed by anyone else? 8 Pages?! That#8217;s insane. Great job, CZ! I bought the silver package.

I just wanted to let you know that there#8217;s an easier way to get the book onto your Kindle. I simply attached the argument paper research .mobi version to an email and conclusion, sent it to my #8220;Send-to-Kindle Email Address#8221; and it magically appeared on my Kindle and argument, worked straight away. Speechsynthesis Data Installer Android? The .mobi version will look just like a Kindle e-book. The .pdf version will also work, but won#8217;t reflow. (I sent the workbook the same way.) This works for wifi and 3G Kindles running recent software versions, and you can set up the argument address when you register your kindle, or change it later on the #8220;Personal Document Settings#8221; page of your Kindle account on Amazon. Great point Tamyka. I should mention that. I wanted the failsafe option, because it doesn#8217;t work for everyone#8217;s Kindle, but you#8217;re definitely right that it#8217;s easier. Having read the book too, I can honestly say that Let#8217;s Write A Short Story! is a wonderful resource for any writer. It will kick your butt to start doing something, but advise you on speechsynthesis data installer, all the steps you need to take and even point how to argument paper mail your submission and on role of media in public, where. Great job Joe; this will help so many people.

Congrats, man. Excited for you and this excellent work. The world needs more stories worth reading. I have written a few short stories: two when I was in Kindergarten and I think four here in research, The Write Practice. :3. I really want to try writing short stories, but for cv format some reason, I can#8217;t. Whenever I write a short story, somehow there#8217;s this plot twist in my mind that makes me want to write a sequel, and research, then another one, and gothic essay conclusion, another one, until it becomes a novel. AND I can#8217;t stand writing anything short #128577; I#8217;m usually satisfied when the story has 3000 words. XD. Congratulations Joe! One question that Indie authors always seem to ask me is #8220;Where can I find someone that can make me a professional looking book cover.#8221; I really don#8217;t have a good answer for it, but can you shed some light onto it. Hi Sonia.

Great question. Erin ,of design-glory.com (our one and only ad in the side bar), made the paper cover for Let#8217;s Write a Short Story! as well as the workbook. She#8217;s amazing. Super fast and not too expensive. I HIGHLY recommend her. If you send people to design-glory.com, have them tell her I recommended her.

Thanks Joe, I#8217;ll let everyone know. Essays Written? I#8217;ve written a short story because i wanted to finish something each day. But i feel like working on my novel and finish a short story is really hard. I can#8217;t not work on my novel because i#8217;m too attached and i can#8217;t give up after all i#8217;ve been through. But i feel like writing short stories could possibly help#8230; Amazing!

I want to get the argument paper book as soon as possible. Essays On How Education Is The Key To A Successful? I#8217;m trying to write a short story feel free to visit my blog and take a look.

Best Essay Writers Here -
Research argument paper - Apreamare

resume with biblatex Yes, the paper research output looks bf . But the underlying toolchain and language are past their expiration date. By far. Tasks as simple as let's add an image here or let's move this to the left a little frequently turn into hour-long journeys deep down into on how is the key to a successful, the guts of a 30 year old codebase. There is no reason why a modern tool couldn't use the same algorithms to create equally beautiful output. We're not writing raw postscript to argument research, talk to our printers anymore either. - Default output is PDF (DVI is on how key to future, a port on my computer :) ) - Optional DOC/DOCX output (even if it supports just a subset of the program's capabilities) - Bibliography management built-in (no separate ancient BibTeX) - Command-line searching and importing from Pubmed / Google Scholar / etc. built-in. - Bibliography styles can be created/edited by argument paper, normal humans. - Syntax closer to Markdown or reStructuredText, to enhance readability of source file (and maybe shrink the education a successful learning curve) - Program is smaller than 1.6 GB (the size of the default MacTeX distro). I've played with writing something like this for argument paper research a while (in Python). The hardest part for me has been dealing with bibliography data - there's always one more weird Pubmed record that breaks my XML parser.

Makes me really appreciate Knuth/Lamport/Patashnik and on role in public, their successors. - The base .tex syntax will probably never change, but there is no reason why some tool/plugin/luatex extension couldn't read something else and convert as necessary. I used Deplate and Pandoc for argument a while. - AFAIK ConTeXt has some integrated replacement for bibtex. I don't think we need a successor to LaTeX. The base is speechsynthesis android texttospeech, solid and ready to be built on, especially now with a sane programming language in the core of LuaTeX. Pdftex (the default Tex engine) supports this. Both Xetex and Luatex do as well, and both of these additionally assume UTF8 as the input encoding and argument paper, allow you to use True Type and OTF fonts directly. 2. Optional DOC/DOCX output (even if it supports just a subset of the program's capabilities) igneous4 mentioned Pandoc, which supports RTF as an output format, which is as good as doc/docx for importing text with basic formatting into Word. Essays Written! Pandoc also supports Context.

If you want to move the other way, there is docx2tex, which is the best Word to research, Latex converter. 3. Bibliography management built-in (no separate ancient BibTeX) I think there's nothing satisfactory here for Latex. You might like to look at Jabref. With Context, the automatic build process makes the invocation of cv format, Bibtex invisible. There are many make-like tools for paper Latex, none are seamless. 4. Command-line searching and importing from Pubmed / Google Scholar / etc. built-in.

Again, nothing built-in, but Zotero will do what you want. 5. Essays Is The Key To Future! Bibliography styles can be created/edited by research, normal humans. Again, nothing adequate here. Try looking at Biblatex. Essays Education Is The Future! I hand/regex edit .bbl files if I have special bib style needs. 6. Syntax closer to Markdown or reStructuredText, to enhance readability of source file (and maybe shrink the learning curve) Tex's markup is paper, actually nice. I often wish I could use Texisms when I am editing Markdown, etc.

Pandoc allows you to on role of media life, convert between all of argument research, these. 7. Program is smaller than 1.6 GB (the size of the default MacTeX distro). Most of data, which is fonts. If you have less than voracious font needs, or use TTF/OTF (via. Luatex/Xetex), you can get away with a small fraction of this. Try a more lightweight Texlive installation, and paper research, find out essay of media life, what you need. The hardest part for me has been dealing with bibliography data - No surprise. Research! Bibliography management used to be a relative strength of the Tex family, because the competition was so extremely shoddy.

Now it is a weakness; Word 2010 with Endnote is actually very nice here. It's a shame that relatively few Latex hackers appreciate how far behind Texco have fallen. Makes me really appreciate Knuth/Lamport/Patashnik - Knuth is cv format, inspirational, his code keeps on argument paper research, rewarding those who read it. Patashnik doesn't get much love from me: he held so many wrong opinions vehemently. Adding images to Latex documents is straightforward using the core libraries graphicx and putting includegraphics at the place you want the graphic. Adjusting placement to left, right, overhand, etc., is done using Tex primitives. It's true that using Tex , Latex and the main Latex packages correctly is not straightforward and speechsynthesis data installer, that until you have mastered them, you can get into difficulties, but that is also true of Word.

The difference is argument paper, that it takes longer learn how to produce any sort of ugly document in thesis for the crucible proctor, Latex than in Word, and longer to produce beautiful documents in Word than in Latex. Sorry, but I'll stick to argument paper research, my point. We should stop making excuses for software that was great in its time but is simply not adequate anymore by today's standards. Almost nothing is cv format, straightforward in LaTex, and images aren't either. Argument! Placing an image exactly where you want it can become a serious issue - even more so in essays by einstein, documents that change and get reflowed all the time.

Yes, LaTex often makes good decisions that require little tweaking. But the moment you disagree with one of its decisions you find yourself in a world of pain. Almost nothing is straightforward in Word, and images aren't either. Word works very intuitively until you try to achieve fine control of layout. Then if you haven't done things the correct way, where Word's document model is not more intuitive than Latex's, getting the results you want will be painful. It is true that the distance between Word and argument research, Latex in terms of suitability for producing high-quality output has narrowed drastically in the time from, say Word 6.0 to Word 2010. But the Tex family is not software that was great in its time. I use both Word and Tex-based technologies most working days, and I massively prefer to the Tex-based technologies in terms of quality output.

It is crucible, still the case that for obtaining quality proofs from research a .doc/.docx file, professionals use external software such as Adobe Indesign. Indeed, there are workflows that take Word documents and convert them to Tex-based representations for typesetting. I don't know a piece of free software that directly competes with LaTeX, the essays written latter has been the de-facto standard for university papers and a small group of paper research, book-writers/enthusiasts for is the key to a successful about 20 years. However, pitting LaTeX against Word is about as meaningful as pitting Linux against Windows. You wouldn't excuse the thorny Linux desktop experience with the security track record of windows either - it'd be an argument paper research, apples vs oranges comparison. Open Office exists as part of a free Java-based ecosystem. I couldn't say it is android, used in any serious publication workflows, but the components are there. Context is aimed at serious publishers, and paper, has strong roots in educational (i.e., not academic) publishing. Apples vs. oranges: the written point of this subthread has been that I thought your statement But the underlying toolchain and argument paper research, language are past their expiration date. Architecture Essay Conclusion! By far. and backing this up by talking about research, how hard easy things can be that turn out to not to be trivialities anywhere.

Latex is not for casual users, but it is very much not past its expiration date for authors who are serious about typesetting. I'm not making excuses for gothic essay conclusion Latex, nor am I unfairly bashing the alternatives. :-) TBH, though, there's just no comparison for producing nicely-formatted research papers. Especially in argument research, that eye-straining, dual-column, 9pt ACM conference format. Of course, there are still some ugly corners, and the underlying code isn't always pretty. Things like Luatex sound quite promising in this regard. Pdftex is currently the standard Tex engine for the two main Tex distributions, Texlive and Miktex. You might think, Oh, well I'll just find a recruiter that won't do this but depending on essays by einstein, your chosen profession this may be harder than you think. You might think, Ok, well I'll just create a PDF version without contact details on paper research, it but that's not enough, because some recruiters actually don't put people forward because they sent PDFs, while telling them that they're putting them forward - the reason being that you're at of media life, the back of the queue not because of ability but because you're 'difficult' or they're not able to paper, stick the recruiters logo on by einstein, or easily paste into their template. Now if none of this is an argument paper research, issue for you, feel free to go ahead and statement crucible, submit a latex generated pdf. Sadly, Word is the lingua franca of recruitment.

I've had two guys interview with me independently of a recruiter for positions after said recruiter told them they'd put them forward when they didn't - in both cases the used a Latex CV. Finally, formatting is relevant only to a point - if you've got experience in your field then that trumps any formatting. I've hired guys who use comic sans in their CV because they were bloody brilliant, not because they were funny. The one contact I had with a recruiting company (big brand name) was when I applied to research, a job, I interviewed with some technical people at the company, they decided to hire me and education key to a successful, they told the recruiting company to argument paper research, tell me I was hired. Cv Format! Some months went by, I got no message, so I took another job, and just for the sake of it I wrote the CTO to tell them they could've at least sent me a note that they weren't hiring me.

Turns out the recruiting company misspelled my email address and they were still waiting for my answer and argument, the position was unfilled. Everyone was apologetic but I couldn't go back as I committed to something else. Actual people I'm interested in cv format, have zero certs, may have zero diplomas, wear ragged jeans and paper research, flip-flops and essay in public, beards, but they have friggin' code to show and run Linux (or some other Unix) on their personal computer. Anything else than displaying obvious ability to write code is paper research, meaningless to me. Since I explained this was the profiles I'm looking for, I didn't received any more resumes from recruiters.

So it all depends very much on the sort of essay life, job you're looking for. My guess is if you're an hacker and you want to work in a startup, never mind the recruiters. Argument Paper Research! Making a latex resume is speechsynthesis data texttospeech, fine, because of the added bonus points. Certs provide a baseline - if you have an MSCE it means you can use Windows, nothing more. Argument Paper! For some positions it's a means of covering your arse which is useful when you're in a big company. Personally I prefer to judge people by thesis statement elizabeth, their deeds rather than their words, or in this case letters. That's why we have a fairly gruelling test for positions these days. It's very hard to source candidates. Argument Paper! Job boards are more or less useless for cv format companies advertising direct, as they're dominated by argument, recruiters (who pay less for job adverts as they're bulk buying and can afford to spend more). Recruiters are also good at getting passive candidates by android texttospeech, cold calling candidates whose details they've obtained through slightly iffy routes.

For example a company won't buy the phone book of a competitor from a disgruntled employee and then start cold calling their staff to research, hire them away, but a third party recruiter will. I'm trying to essays on how future, raise financing at the moment to paper research, build a startup that will provide an alternative solution (a job site with intelligent candidate/job matching using the kind of architecture, techniques dating sites use). If anyone wants to argument paper, see my pitch deck feel free to email me (even if you're not an data installer, investor, happy to share with anyone who's not a direct competitor). I sent you an argument paper research, email regarding your startup since it interests me on an academic level and I'd love to learn a little more. The root problem is that many places don't measure performance and essays written, so you get the same problems which are endemic in marketing where successes are credited to argument research, people but failures are seen as systemic. At the last few places, our recruiters literally failed to provide a single qualified candidate (or even strong resume) but this was usually excused as a tough market - and while good people are always in is the key to, short supply, taking the paper 30% cut which normally goes to the recruiter and giving it to the person would certainly help. That said, almost 100% of the non-college hires I made were either personal recommendations from other members on the team or people whom I directly contacted after seeing their name pop up repeatedly in essay of media in public life, the context of interesting things. If you imagine a pre-Internet world, recruiters would provide employers value by having a large potential labour pool, searching that pool for 'talent', then (allegedly) doing some sort of screening so that HR gets CVs that are relevant to the post. In the modern age, much of this could be bypassed but some companies (most notably larger companies) have exclusive contracts with large recruiters, meaning that if you want to paper research, work there you have to go through a specific recruiter. Madness, I know, and on how is the key to a successful, an industry ripe for disruption but full of people that would fight tooth and nail against it (and not just the argument paper recruiters but the employers in some cases). I have a very simple solution - avoid applying there!

Often people who tend to write their resumes in LaTeX would find most of these jobs less than acceptable anyways. When exceptions are required I extract a text version of the essays on how education a successful resume latex2 rtf/txt/html (or combination) tend to work ok. The rtf and text can easily be saved as .doc. Of course thing are never going to argument research, be as pretty as the for the crucible elizabeth proctor PDF (but then again these job applications are rarely priorities) Here is a sample derived from my resume: http://ranchev.net/latex. I have a very simple solution - avoid applying there! If more people voted with their feet when companies pull this sort of crap, the world would be much better place. They asked me to send them a .doc Word version. I changed the suffix on paper, my file from .txt to .doc, sent them essentially the essays education is the future exact same file.

It opened for them in Word because of the suffix, they were happy and I was then interviewed and hired. That still makes me smile, these many years gone by. To be fair, I still don't have a resume in HTML (I'd use Markdown), but I haven't needed to update mine in a while. Next time I do, I'm going HTML with a print stylesheet. 2) LaTeX is argument paper research, a text formatting language. It can be argued HTML is thesis for the proctor, (fundamentally) also a text formatting language, but if you submit a resume to me styled with HTML and paper research, CSS using colors and graphics and drop shadows, I will personally burn your resume, damn the consequences. And of cv format, course, I wouldn't use CSS to colour everything and add gradients and all that junk. Paper! The goal is speechsynthesis data texttospeech, simply to create a nice layout in a format that doesn't depend on paper research, MS Word or LaTeX (which, nice though it may be, is alien to most and also not as commonly installed as a web browser). And naturally, I'd print-to-PDF before sending off to a recruiter.

Mac OS X Print-To-PDF is really quite lovely. - Guy who is interested in by einstein, this issue as his resume is HTML but without drop shadows. I'd still use LaTeX, though. Media types are just a really cool trick. Mine has been in HTML + CSS since about 1998 (over 12 years now, back then it was XHTML) with CSS print styles. Everything inlined and paper research, very compact. Works great. The content of the resume is JSON data (http://sidneysm.com/resume/resume.json) with some embedded Markdown, and written, it's transformed into an HTML document by a JavaScript tempting library I hacked up on top of jquery-haml. It doesn't look very nice when printed/PDFed by printing to research, PDF.

I've learned a great deal by reading Hacker News. (Unlike, say, Firefox on Linux, it doesn't add header or footers, the text looks great, and in general doesn't look terrible at speechsynthesis data texttospeech, all.) Details of argument, this print dialog might, of course, depend on your GNOME version, your distribution, and the time of month, like everything on statement for the, Linux. Now the quality of the text is a separate issue; I haven't actually done any printing from paper a web browser on Linux in essay on role of media in public life, a few years, so I have no idea what that looks like nowadays. As far as links go, I already treat the resume like a print document; all the URLs are written out explicitly, have their own lines where appropriate. (I guess that's why I haven't run into paper, the problem yet.) I would love to put my resume into LaTeX, if I had a simple way to do so. Unfortunately, it would be a pretty painful process, and not something for which I have currently budgeted the time. I will check out some of on role life, these templates and frameworks mentioned in the future. For now, though, since I haven't even started my new job yet, not an especially urgent project : ) While I'm on the topic: slides (presentation) done via LaTeX (and in PDF) look simply _amazing_.

Powerpoint has _nothing_ on LaTeX + PDF. Seriously, I have seen plenty of talks on plenty of argument paper research, conferences and events and the ones done with LaTeX always stood out as the most boring (-looking) ones. 4 mo. ago) I finally invested the installer texttospeech time and effort to break free of Word docs and switch to LaTeX. Honestly, I spent about research, a week relearning the basic syntax (it's been years) and essays by einstein, learning how to do much more advanced formatting than I had done before. The effort I put in was worth every single minute. I started with a fairly advanced template and tweaked the hell out of it until I was satisfied with the end result.

I now have a resume that is: 1) version controlled in git as text/code (don't underestimate how cool this is) 2) very simple to update or add sections to without worrying about breaking Word's formatting. 3) looks stunning, imho. 4) got me callbacks from argument research nearly every place I applied to. I feel like the eye-catching resume was a huge part of this. You write code all day long.. formatting a document with it just makes so much more sense once you make the initial time investment. If a recruiter or job site can't handle the PDF, I don't want to work with them anyway. I suppose it's fine if you're satisfied with some default look that someone else has come up with for your document.

But for me that's never good enough. I want my documents to look a certain way, and it's virtually never the case that any LaTeX class or document style looks good enough with the cv format default settings. Argument! So I wind up doing endless tweaking until finally it looks the way I want it to. Of course, by installer texttospeech, then it does look brilliant. And the time spent is well worth it. But you do have to put in the time to get these kinds of results, if the default settings don't suit you. That assumes a number of things:

First, it assumes that at some point you'll settle on some perfect formatting for argument all time. That's really unlikely (especially for me). Second, it assumes that the same resume format is appropriate for each prospective employer you'll be sending your resume to. Essay On Role In Public Life! There are many who feel you should tailor your resume to the employer you're sending it to. That could certainly include tailoring the format, depending on how different the jobs you're applying for are. A resume for a web design job might look very different from one for a programming job.

And many people do both. Third, it assumes your LaTeX skills will never improve and you'll never discover new styles or fonts or tricks you'll want to apply to your resume to make it better in the future. Things you didn't know at the time you first wrote it. All these are potentially incorrect assumptions. Paper! There are some great reasons to essays is the key to a successful, keep tinkering with the formatting, even in LaTeX. That said, I never implied in my original post that the argument paper reason that I spent a lot of gothic conclusion, time futzing with the paper formatting in LaTeX was because I was re-formatting stuff I'd already formatted to my satisfaction once. Essay On Role Of Media Life! No. In fact, it took a long time to research, format it in the first place. Yes, it's true that maybe this will save me time and grief in the long run (if I can let sleeping dogs lie, and not try to improve the on how education is the a successful future formatting once I've settled on one I like), but maybe not.

Anyway, I'm not trying to convince anyone to paper research, ditch LaTeX and switch to Word. I love LaTeX. Thesis Statement! And I hate it. It's a love/hate thing. There are some really great things about it. It can make your documents look marvelous, and you can do some amazing things with it. But it can also be very frustrating (especially if you want to argument paper research, do stuff that's non-standard, and essay on role of media in public life, varies too far from the argument paper research defaults that the texttospeech (often broken) document classes had in mind when they were written). Not that recruiters are always the best way to get a job, but it would be silly to write them out of my searches. EDIT: another issue further down: compare Sed and Vestibulum. In the latter the e looks way too far from the argument paper initial letter.

More careful kerning would push the essay on role of media life e a bit under V's wings. I realize it's not the most important thing in the world, but still :) Anyway, I don't claim to be an expert in typography at all, that's why I also use LaTeX for my CV: I must confess that I don't understand it well but it has inspired me to actually try LaTeX for paper the first time. (EDIT - fixed dumb typo. Thanks, RiderOfGiraffes) Contact me by email and let me know a good reason you'd like to see it and I'll be happy to send a copy along to you. Sure, I will try to convince you that I want to see your resume because your skills look like a good match for a position I'm trying to fill. Thesis Statement! Except I don't know your skills because. I don't have access to your resume. Talk about paper research, some ego.

Taking a simple task like writing a document in speechsynthesis data texttospeech, Word and using it as an argument, excuse to thesis for the crucible proctor, learn a text formatting language sounds perfectly reasonable for a hacker. Learning latex because you're curious is argument paper research, one thing. Using latex on your resume solely to give the impression you know latex would qualify as affecting greater talent than is actually possessed. It's cynical and utterly baseless to deduce pretentious motives. McGee explicitly mentions that the reason he does it in LaTeX is essays written, not to get the argument research +12 points bonus. I think you're being presumptuous in accusing others of being pretentious for using LaTeX.

As far as the ease of use and the typography functions, i find Pages (from the education key to a successful future iWork suite) to be more than adequate. The layout that he did would have taken me only moments to re-create in Pages, and although LaTeX has some advanced typography features that Pages and argument paper research, OS X don't, the thesis elizabeth latter seems sufficient to me for just about anyone's CV. See sample resume's here: http://www.math.uic.edu/ But it looks like a plain article class LaTeX document, except that I changed the margins and the font (Palatino instead of Times). If you want a more sophisticated layout you can customize the LaTeX-specific options; they'll be ignored when you export to other formats. There are an absolute glut of LaTeX tutorials out argument paper, there to get you started. Here's one: But there are many, many others. Some are particularly good for people in architecture conclusion, certain specialties. For instance, here's an excellent LaTeX resource for research logicians:

If you're comfortable with Vim or Emacs, both of essays on how education future, them have good LaTeX support. Research! The AucTeX package for Emacs is cv format, particularly excellent (it needs to argument paper, be installed separately, but Debian packages it). There are also editors best described as LaTeX IDEs. Essay! They provide a syntax-highlighting editor and have particular support for running the argument research LaTeX processing toolchain, parsing error messages and warnings (a nontrivial proposition), and sometimes provide support for generating LaTeX code snippets like table layouts. Essays Written By Einstein! One such package is Texmaker, a Qt-based IDE with a look-and-feel somewhat like Qt Creator. I think linkedin has a resume upload and maybe branchout does as well if you are more of the social networking type. You can get the template by git clone git://github.com/dscape/NunoJobResume.git. One sort of hackish thing you could try is simply printing out argument, your resume and scanning it in.

Then import the scanned pages as images directly in to the Word document. It will technically be in Word format, and may even look nice when printed (assuming you've scanned your printouts in at a high enough resolution). Though, of course, the text won't be editable.

Write my essay -
Argument Paper On Immigration Essay Research Paper |…

6 most violated resume writing rules. Five most violated resume-writing rules. This is the problem with the resume-writing world: Everyone thinks they#039;re an exception to the rules. Everyone thinks they can pick and research choose which rules are important. Do not do this.

Until you work in human resources and statement personally scan 300 resumes a day, you are in no position to discard rules of paper, resume writing. Here are the six most violated rules among the resumes that people send to me to review: 1. One page. The job of a resume is to get you an essays interview, not get you a job. A hiring manager has to sift through a pile of resumes to figure out which person to interview. Argument. Each resume gets about a ten-second look. If you think you need a longer resume, give someone one page of your resume and have them look at it for ten seconds. Ask them what they remember; it won#039;t be much. They are not going to remember any more information in ten seconds if you give them two pages to look at; ten seconds is cv format, ten seconds. 2. Ditch the line about references on request.

It#039;s implied. Paper. Of course, if someone wants a reference, you will give one. Data Texttospeech. No one presumes that you will not. So when you write that you will provide a reference you seem to not understand how the game is played. (Bonus tip: If you have an excellent reference, like a CEO of a Fortune 500 company who vacations with your Mom, have the reference call before you even go to the interview. Sets the tone for the employer to think you are amazing.) 3. Tread lightly on the personal interests line. Your personal interests are not there to research, make you look interesting. They are there to get you an interview. Every line on your resume is architecture essay, there to get you an interview. So only list personal interests that reveal a quality that will help you meet the employer#039;s needs. If you are in sports marketing, then by all means, list that you kayak. If you were an Olympic athlete, put it down because it shows focus and achievement.

If you are a mediocre hobbyist, leave it off. Personal interests that don#039;t make you stand out as an argument paper achiever do not help you. And personal interests that are weird make you look weird and you don#039;t know if your interviewer likes weird or not, so leave weird off the resume. Essays By Einstein. 4. Paper Research. You must list achievements, not job duties. Anyone can do a job. Essays Written. Achievements show you did the job well. Research. Past performance is the best indicator of future performance, so don#039;t let someone think you just showed up for your last job and didn#039;t do it well. It#039;s very hard to essays, see your achievements from the trenches; you might think you did not have achievements because your boss doesn#039;t ask you to paper research, do achievements, your boss asks you to do tasks and of media in public life projects. But you need to paper, recognize that you do not see achievements and ask for help to see them. A resume coach, or even a friend, can help you to see them more clearly.

5. Essays Is The. Don#039;t be a designer unless you are. If you have more than three fonts on your resume and you#039;re not a designer, I can promise you that you#039;ve botched the layout. If design were easy, no one would get paid for it. Recognize your strengths and keep design elements to the bare minimum. Argument Paper Research. And please, save Photoshop for cards to of media in public, your mom: Just because you know how to use the argument paper shading tools doesn#039;t mean you know how to use them well. 6. List your most recent job first. Chronological order is only a good idea if you are looking to get hired to go back in essays by einstein, time.

Otherwise you look like you#039;re bucking resume writing convention in order to hide something, which you probably are, but you have to do it with a better sleight of hand than that. 17 comments on “ 6 most violated resume writing rules ” 2. #8220;Ditch the line about references on argument, request.#8221; Very good advice. But if someone is dumb enough to think I won#8217;t ask for references if they don#8217;t put that line in, there#8217;s little hope of them giving it up. I struggled #8212; struggled #8212; to get a friend to give it up without success. He consulted the VP in his company and that eminent personage (goofball) told him not to listen to a successful future, me. 1. #8220;One page.#8221; I don#8217;t agree. Argument. It depends on how much information you have to handle. Mind you, if you#8217;re in essays on how is the future, Gen Y, you won#8217;t have enough experience for two pages and then this advice would be fine.

4. #8220;List achievements, not job duties.#8221; A lot of people who don#8217;t understand your job will be scanning your resume for duties they can match to the job specifications. I#8217;m one of those people. So, duties then achievements is what I look for. How do you feel about listing basic computer competence? I feel it is a waste of a line to put: proficient in argument paper research, MS Outlook, Powerpoint, Word, etc. I think you#8217;d have a difficult time finding a professional today that lacks those abilities. You obviously don#8217;t have colleagues like mine, whose documents and spreadsheets I get called on to fix almost every day#8230; (On the thesis crucible elizabeth proctor other hand, if people list computer proficiencies on research, their resumes, I would tend to be sceptical without a proficiency test.) on Reverse Chronological Order: what#8217;s the problem with this?

I#8217;ve only ever seen resumes that start from the job you currently hold then work backwards from there. Architecture Essay Conclusion. It makes sense for argument paper research an employer to be able to see them in that order. Are you saying we should list our current job first, THEN list the first job I ever had? won#8217;t that look weird? Thanks for pointing out the error. I fixed it. I agree with everything except number one. There is gothic architecture essay, no way a resume should be just one page long. I look for historical performance and job consistency. Argument. And to be honest, I am also looking for keywords (skills) and for the proctor how long those keywords were in use. If I have to go to the 2nd or 3rd page to get those details so be it. Additionally, if you make the first cut your resume will be reviewed in more detail.

One page doesn#8217;t provide much detail. What do you think about including an line in your resume for your #8220;objective#8221;? As in, #8220;Objective: To make company xyz the leader in widget production worldwide#8221;? My stepmother swears it#8217;s essential, but I think it#8217;s goofy. What do you think? Leave it off. Your objective is to leverage your skills and experience to argument research, get a job with the company you are applying to. If your objective is anything else you shouldn#8217;t be applying. Essays Written By Einstein. As far as the one page resume I think this an important rule to argument research, follow if it is even a question in your mind. Thesis For The. By that I mean, if you are applying for an entry level or mid level job, one page. Paper Research. If you need more than one page you will #8220;know#8221; you need more than one page.

Accomplishments for thesis for the crucible proctor scanning by the human eye; a separate resume with duties for those machine scanners that have not yet evolved sufficiently to understand accomplishments. That initial 10 second skimming seldom gets beyond the paper middle of the first page. At that point a one or multi-page resume is irrelevant. But if that 10 seconds generates interest, the reader then WANTS information. The more experienced applicant will lose interviews if enough information to make a decision is lacking. I have redone my resume a million times over. I am at wits end#8230;#8230;.can#8217;t seem to find a job in this Houston. Moving to PA, my hubby got a job there#8230;.seems they have jobs there#8230;#8230;..are there sites that can help in doing my resume for a fee..

This is AMAZING. Extremely useful and helpful but also hilarious at the same time :) I am sick and tired of rewriting and future revising resumes too. Argument. Now, what is on role of media, your honest advice in curbing the gap barrier. Twenty-three plus years of research, experience is 23 years. Where does a person begin at 57 years of age?? By the way, make it 2 pages and cv format 3 if need be. Thanks for the opportunity.

I am always looking for a job. Paper Research. I work in the event industry and it was hit pretty hard by the recession. Also, there is a lot of change in the industry, tons of freelancers. All this means is that I#8217;m an by einstein expert job seeker #8212; unfortunately. I used to paper, be an agency recruiter and have been interviewed by a lot of HR people, as well as other agency recruiters and have been on the hiring end, both for a company and an agency, also as a salesperson selling recruitment services into any company. So, seeing the full spectrum of things has really openend my eyes on essay, how to job hunt. I agree with all the argument research points listed except the first one.

Funny, young people think a one pager is not enough, older people think a 2 pager is too long. Some people feel that a binder of all achievement documents are required for an interview. All I can say is, do what suits your personality. If you just graduated, use one page. Thesis For The. If you have been around for 20 years like me, do 2 3 pages. Always apply with a cover letter, it looks more professional, it doesn#8217;t matter if its generic. Paper Research. Use a career objective, it means you have a goal. List job duties/responsibilities, because agency and HR software look for keywords, like #8220;operations#8221; #8220;sales#8221;, etc. Type up your achievments and take them with you to the interview, talk about yourself using that.

I never much liked people who listed their personal interests. It takes away from the fact that a resume is essays by einstein, a summary of your career history. Something more interesting and relevant is argument paper research, volunteer work. At least its commendable. One more final point. No one ever reads a resume from beginning to end, unless its the owner a company and essays by einstein he#8217;s hiring you out of his own pocket. Then the argument paper research fine tooth comb comes out.

Otherwise, HR people are way too busy to read, most of them are women and women are attracted to nice things. Essay On Role In Public Life. Make sure you format the resume to argument paper research, #8220;look#8221; very appealing. This will get you a phone call for essay of media in public life sure. Also, if you never want to argument paper research, worry about having a hard time finding work, try to get a job at a big company doing anything and stay there for as long as possible. Recruiters and HR people always look for what is installer, safest for themselves and their company first. THey only research, hire the of media in public life ones that fit into a certain mould. Big brand company names that are well known will always get interest before joe blow company ever would.

Okay, I will try this. For some reason, I have never been taught about the cover letter, but common sense told me to write a one-page #8220;RESUME#8221; that fits in paper, just after my job history. May I assume the written correct way would be to cut that out, and make it my front page? After all, it is paper, my entire history, rewritten in cv format, a sort of paper research, engaging, friendly and story-like manner. Data Installer Android. I am a recruiter and I agree with much of what you stated here with the exception of argument paper research, cramming everything on to one page. I would rather see an informative resume. If two pages is architecture, necesssary to bullet point out 5 job duty lines along with 3-4 accomplishments that would be useful. I dont need to see what you were doing 20 years ago or jobs that have no relevance to the open position. One page? Sorry, that is just not enough for paper an accomplished, experienced professional and results in underselling your achievements.

At least from the perspective of every recruiter to whom I have ever spoken about the in public life subject, the #8220;one-page-rule#8221; applies, at most, to the entry-level job seeker. Paper. Fire the middle man (the recruiter) and architecture the job market problem will be solved, the company will save and argument paper the employees will be happy. thanks for your advice. Essays By Einstein. but, i have a few questions to ask. it looks like most recruiters are looking for an experience and argument paper research accomplishment in a resume. so, how can i write a resume if i dont have any experience and essays education is the future any relavant achievement that match the job?. please help me here, then i will start to build my resume from the cratch. i have been looking for jobs for so long since i am a Computer Science Graduate.

Write My Research Paper for Me -
Argument Research Paper

essay on media news Robert G. Kaiser. I n 1998, Ralph Terkowitz, a vice president of The Washington Post Co., got to know Sergey Brin and Larry Page, two young Silicon Valley entrepreneurs who were looking for research backers. Terkowitz remembers paying a visit to the garage where they were working and essay of media in public keeping his car and driver waiting outside while he had a meeting with them about the paper research idea that eventually became Google. In Public. An early investment in Google might have transformed the Post 's financial condition, which became dire a dozen years later, by which time Google was a multi-billion dollar company. But nothing happened. “We kicked it around,” Terkowitz recalled, but the then-fat Post Co. had other irons in other fires. Such missteps are not surprising. Argument Research. People living through a time of revolutionary change usually fail to cv format, grasp what is going on around them. The American news business would get a C minus or worse from any fair-minded professor evaluating its performance in the first phase of the Digital Age. Big, slow-moving organizations steeped in paper, their traditional ways of doing business could not accurately foresee the next stages of a technological whirlwind. Obviously, new technologies are radically altering the ways in which we learn, teach, communicate, and are entertained.

It is impossible to know today where these upheavals may lead, but where they take us matters profoundly. Cv Format. How the digital revolution plays out over time will be particularly important for journalism, and therefore to the United States, because journalism is the craft that provides the lifeblood of a free, democratic society. The Founding Fathers knew this. They believed that their experiment in self-governance would require active participation by an informed public, which could only be possible if people had unfettered access to information. James Madison, author of the First Amendment guaranteeing freedom of paper research speech and of the press, summarized the thesis for the crucible proposition succinctly: “The advancement and argument paper research diffusion of knowledge is the only guardian of true liberty.” Thomas Jefferson explained to his French friend, the Marquis de Lafayette, The only essays key to future security of all is in a free press. The force of public opinion cannot be resisted when permitted freely to be expressed.” American journalists cherish another of Jefferson's remarks: “Were it left to me to paper, decide whether we should have a government without newspapers or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter.”

The journalistic ethos that animated many of the Founders was embodied by a printer, columnist, and editor from Philadelphia named Benjamin Franklin. The printing press, which afforded Franklin his livelihood, remained the engine of American democracy for more than two centuries. But then, in the second half of the gothic architecture conclusion 20th century, new technologies began to undermine long-established means of paper research sharing information. First television and on how education future then the computer and the Internet transformed the way people got their news. Nonetheless, even at the end of the century, the business of providing news and analysis was still a profitable enough undertaking that it could support large organizations of professional reporters and editors in print and broadcast media. Now, however, in the first years of the 21st century, accelerating technological transformation has undermined the business models that kept American news media afloat, raising the possibility that the great institutions on which we have depended for argument paper research news of the world around us may not survive. These are painful words to write for someone who spent 50 years as a reporter and on how is the key to editor at The Washington Post . For the first 15 years of my career, the Post 's stories were still set in lead type by linotype machines, now seen only in museums.

We first began writing on computers in the late 1970s, which seemed like an unequivocally good thing until the rise of the research Internet in the 1990s. Elizabeth. Then, gradually, the ground began to shift beneath us. By the time I retired earlier this year, the Graham family had sold the Post to paper research, Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, for $250 million, a small fraction of its worth just a few years before. Donald Graham, the chief executive at the time, admitted that he did not know how to essay on role in public, save the argument newspaper. In fact, digital technology has flummoxed the owners of essays written traditional news media, especially newspapers, from the beginning. For example, in 1983, in the early years of computerized production of newspapers when almost no one knew what was coming, The New York Times almost committed digital suicide.

The Times decided it only needed to retain the rights to argument paper, the electronic versions of cv format its stories for 24 hours after publication. To make a little extra money, the Times sold rights to everything older than 24 hours to Mead Data Central, owners of the argument Lexis-Nexis service. Mead Data Central then sold electronic access to Times stories to law firms, libraries, and gothic essay the public. By the early 1990s, as the Internet was becoming functional and argument paper research popular, this arrangement was a big and growing problem: newspapers, including the Times , were planning “online,” computerized editions, but the education is the key to a successful Times had sold control of its own product to Mead Data. Luckily for the country's best newspaper, the Anglo-Dutch firm Reed Elsevier bought Mead Data in 1994. The sale triggered a provision in the original Times -Mead contract that allowed the Times to reclaim the electronic rights to its own stories.

That enabled the paper research Times to put its journalism online in 1995. But putting newspapers online has not remotely restored their profitability. For the moment, The New York Times is making a small profit, but its advertising revenues are not reassuring. The Washington Post made profits of more than $120 million a year in the late 1990s, and today loses money—last year more than $40 million. Newsweek magazine failed, and Time magazine is teetering. Once-strong regional newspapers from Los Angeles to Miami, from Chicago to Philadelphia, find themselves in desperate straits, their survival in doubt.

News divisions of the major television networks have been cutting back for more than two decades, and are now but a feeble shadow of their former selves. Overall the economic devastation would be difficult to exaggerate. One statistic conveys its dimensions: the advertising revenue of all America's newspapers fell from $63.5 billion in 2000 to statement for the elizabeth, about $23 billion in 2013, and is still falling. Traditional news organizations' financial well-being depended on the willingness of advertisers to argument paper, pay to reach the mass audiences they attracted. Advertisers were happy to gothic architecture essay conclusion, pay because no other advertising medium was as effective.

But in argument research, the digital era, which has made it relatively simple to target advertising in very specific ways, a big metropolitan or national newspaper has much less appeal. Internet companies like Google and statement for the crucible proctor Facebook are able to sort audiences by the most specific criteria, and thus to offer advertisers the possibility of spending their money only on ads they know will reach only people interested in what they are selling. So Google, the master of targeted advertising, can provide a retailer selling sheets and towels an audience existing exclusively of people who have gone online in the last month to shop for sheets and towels. This explains why even as newspaper revenues have plummeted, the ad revenue of Google has leapt upward year after year—from $70 million in 2001 to an astonishing $50.6 billion in 2013. Paper. That is more than two times the combined advertising revenue of every newspaper in America last year. And the situation for proprietors of newspapers and magazines is likely to get worse. Essay. One alarming set of statistics: Americans spend about 5 percent of the time they devote to media of all kinds to magazines and newspapers. But nearly 20 percent of advertising dollars still go to print media. So print media today are getting billions more than they probably deserve from advertisers who, governed by the inertia so common in research, human affairs, continue to buy space in publications that are steadily losing audience, especially among the young. When those advertisers wake up, revenues will plummet still further.

King County Journal. Union City Register Tribune. Halifax Daily News. Rocky Mountain News. News organizations have tried to adapt to the new realities. As the Internet became more popular and architecture essay more important in the first decade of the 21st century, newspaper proprietors dreamed of paying for their newsrooms by mimicking their traditional business model in the online world.

Their hope was to create mass followings for their websites that would appeal to argument research, advertisers the way their ink-on-paper versions once did. Essays Written. But that’s not what happened. The news organizations with the most popular websites did attract lots of eyeballs, but general advertising on their sites did not produce compelling results for advertisers, so they did not buy as much of it as the papers had hoped. And the price they paid for it steadily declined, because as the Internet grew, the number of sites offering advertising opportunities assured that “supply” outstripped “demand.” Advertising revenues for the major news sites never amounted to even a significant fraction of the revenues generated by argument research, printed newspapers in the golden age. Essay. There seems little prospect today that online advertising revenues will ever be as lucrative as advertising on paper once was. The other online innovation that has devastated newspapers is Craigslist, the free provider of what the newspapers call “classified advertising,” the small items in paper research, small print used by individuals and businesses for generations to buy and sell real estate and merchandise, and to hire workers. Twenty years ago classifieds provided more than a third of the revenue of The Washington Post . Thesis Statement. Craigslist has destroyed that business for the Post and every major paper in the country. The Philadelphia Inquirer/Daily News headquarters building on argument paper research Broad Street in Philadelphia, October 6, 2005. Thesis Statement Crucible. The paper is one of many major newspapers facing cutbacks and dwindling circulation. D espite two decades of trying, no one has found a way to make traditional news-gathering sufficiently profitable to argument, assure its future survival. Serious readers of America's most substantial news media may find this description at odds with their daily experience.

After all, The New York Times , The Wall Street Journal , and The Washington Post still provide rich offerings of good journalism every morning, and they have been joined by numerous online providers of both opinion and news—even of classic investigative reporting. Digital publications employ thousands of gothic architecture essay reporters and editors in new and sometimes promising journalistic enterprises. Is this a disaster? Of course not—yet. But today's situation is probably misleading. The laws of economics cannot be ignored or repealed. Nor can the actuarial tables. Only about a third of Americans under 35 look at a newspaper even once a week, and the percentage declines every year. A large portion of today's readers of the few remaining good newspapers are much closer to research, the grave than to high school. Today's young people skitter around the Internet like ice skaters, exercising their short attention spans by is the key to a successful, looking for fun and, occasionally, seeking out serious information. Audience taste seems to be changing, with the result that among young people particularly there is a declining appetite for the sort of information packages the great newspapers provided, which included national, foreign and local news, business news, cultural news and criticism, editorials and opinion columns, sports and obituaries, lifestyle features, and science news.

Alas for those who continue to want access to that kind of product, there is no right to reliable, intelligent, comprehensive journalism. We only get it when someone provides it. And if it doesn’t pay someone a profit, it’s not likely to be produced. New York City. 1959. TV news anchorman Walter Cronkite. © Dennis Stock/Magnum Photos. B efore digital technology changed the world, the news was quite orderly and argument predictable. To find out what was happening, you bought a paper, listened to the radio, or watched television.

Most people relied on one or two sources for essay conclusion all their news—a newspaper and a TV network, for example. A few institutions and a few individuals dominated the provision of news: Walter Cronkite and John Chancellor; The New York Times and The Washington Post ; Time and Newsweek . Argument Paper. The universe of news providers was small and also remarkably homogeneous. David Brinkley could move from data texttospeech NBC to ABC without causing much of research a stir. When Roone Arledge, whose first big accomplishment was to make ABC the leading network for sports, was empowered to build a new ABC News, he did it by raiding the staffs of NBC and CBS. Similarly, when Ted Turner launched CNN, he poached talent from the networks.

This small, nearly-closed world rarely provided any surprises. Politically, the big news organizations cast themselves as fair-minded and even-handed, never partisan. Time magazine may have been somewhat more conservative, The New York Times more liberal, but none drifted far from the center of the cv format political spectrum. Argument Paper Research. For nearly four decades after World War II, mainstream journalism was notably non-ideological. At the height of their success, all the best news organizations shared two important qualities: a strong sense of data installer android texttospeech responsibility about their roles as providers of news and analysis, and plenty of paper research money to installer texttospeech, spend on those missions.

In their heyday, roughly the last third of the 20th century, these institutions tended to unify American society. News anchors like Cronkite, Chancellor, Tom Brokaw, Dan Rather, and argument paper research Peter Jennings were reassuring, avuncular figures with whom millions of education key to Americans shared the dramas of the day. All the argument paper mainstream print and essays by einstein broadcast media sought to provide an information supermarket whose aisles—from sports to research, business to politics, foreign affairs, entertainment news, and gossip—would hopefully attract mass audiences across all classes of society. And they made money—a lot of it—by selling those mass audiences to advertisers. NBC/NBCU Photo Bank via Getty Images.

The money allowed for an extravagant approach to news. Editors and producers could put their news instincts ahead of other considerations, including profits—at least occasionally. I did this myself, dispatching reporters around the country and the world with something awfully close to abandon when I was a senior editor of The Washington Post . The best newspapers—the best of a much more crowded field than exists today—invested in essay on role of media, Washington bureaus, foreign correspondents, and paper research investigative reporting teams, not to mention luxuries almost unheard of now. For years, for cv format example, no reporter for paper the Los Angeles Times had to suffer the indignity of flying in coach; business or first class was the norm. Essays Education Is The Key To. The broadcast media enjoyed even more extravagance. In the 1970s the three television networks each maintained large corps of foreign correspondents stationed in argument paper, bureaus across the globe, and also domestic bureaus in essay in public life, the major American cities. They all did serious documentaries and showed them in research, prime time. Editors and producers pursued stories that interested them, without much concern for how readers or viewers might react to the journalism that resulted. Members of this tribe of journalists shared a sense of what “the news” was. The most influential of them were the editors and reporters on the best newspapers, whose decisions were systematically embraced and essays written by einstein echoed by other editors and writers, as well as by the producers of television news. As many have noted now that their power has declined, these news executives were gatekeepers of argument paper a kind, deciding which stories got the most attention.

The most obvious examples of their discretionary power came in the realm of investigative reporting. One of the cardinal events of this era was Walter Cronkite's decision in late October 1972 to report in detail on the CBS Evening News the of media findings of two young Washington Post reporters, Carl Bernstein and paper Bob Woodward, on cv format the developing Watergate scandal. Cronkite’s decision highlighted the strength of the news culture, while also helping to put the Post —then still emerging as a leading newspaper—at the center of national attention. This was a golden era in journalism, a time when a prosperous and widely-respected press demonstrated an paper research, unprecedented willingness to confront a sitting president. Thesis Statement For The Elizabeth Proctor. Watergate and argument paper research the Vietnam War both made it much easier to challenge authority. Essays A Successful Future. Newspapers especially began to show increasing self-confidence—sometimes it felt like arrogance—by moving away from reactive journalism that focused on the events of the previous day and devoting more space and energy to paper research, “enterprise” journalism, which included not just in-depth investigations, but stories about trends in society, profiles, and feature stories. Thanks to this new boldness, the relationship between reporters and government deteriorated and became quite contentious. Deference gave way to skepticism and, often, cynicism about the believability of cv format public officials and government agencies.

One of the great symbolic moments of this era was the decision by argument paper, the Nixon administration to seek a court order to stop The New York Times from publishing details of speechsynthesis android a secret Pentagon history of the Vietnam war that a disgruntled official had leaked to the paper. Initially a federal district court accepted the government’s argument that publication endangered “national security,” and issued an order to the Times to cease publication of stories based on the “Pentagon Papers.” The Times 's source, Daniel Ellsberg, then leaked another set of the papers to argument, The Washington Post , which hurriedly began preparing stories about written by einstein them. The government sought court action to block the argument Post as well. The Supreme Court agreed to take the case. The Times and Post hired some of the for the elizabeth best (and most expensive) lawyers in the country to argue for publication. Research. The court quickly decided in favor of the newspapers' right to publish. Nixon's attempt to impose “prior restraint” on the American press had failed. Two private corporations, the Times and Post companies, had defied the government and then persuaded the Supreme Court to let them get away with it. Cv Format. Journalists still remember this as a critical moment in argument paper research, the history of their business. 1902-03: Ida Tarbell profiles John D. Cv Format. Rockefeller and the Standard Oil Company The progressive era of the late 19th and early 20th centuries was a time of social activism as Americans and their president, Theodore Roosevelt, fought corruption and argument paper research monopolistic practices in by einstein, government and industry.

Tarbell, a former school teacher, wrote a series of articles for McClure’s Magazine about the giant Standard Oil Company and its owner John D. Rockefeller. The series was published in book form in 1904, and in 1911 the U.S. Supreme Court found the company to be in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act, causing its breakup. Paper Research. Ironically, Tarbell didn’t like the term “muckraker,” which was applied to gothic architecture, her and other reform-minded journalists of the era. 1906: Upton Sinclair exposes conditions in Chicago's meatpacking plants Chicago was America’s center of meat processing and argument paper packing around the turn of the century in 1900. Although Sinclair’s famous 1906 work, The Jungle , was a novel, he based it on on role seven weeks in argument paper, disguise working in a successful future, Chicago’s meatpacking plants. His exposé of conditions that immigrant workers faced in the stockyards and paper the unsanitary practices of the for the crucible proctor industry coincided with passage of the research Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906 and the Federal Meat Inspection Act of 1906.

Sinclair later focused on American journalism itself, calling attention in 1920 to essays written, the practice of “yellow journalism” in argument research, his book The Brass Check . 1953: Murrey Marder dogs Sen. Joseph McCarthy's witch hunt In February 1950, U.S. Cv Format. Senator Joe McCarthy declared that more than 200 Communists were working at the U.S. State Department. Paper. After his re-election in 1952, McCarthy conducted a series of essay conclusion hearings on the matter and implicated Army personnel in espionage. In 1953, Murrey Marder, writing for The Washington Post , began full-time coverage of argument paper Sen. McCarthy and his hearings. Marder investigated the senator's accusations against Army personnel stationed at Fort Monmouth in New Jersey, finding that the senator's charges against them were all false. Marder later opened the London bureau of the The Post , and after his retirement, helped create the Nieman Watchdog Project.

1962-64: David Halberstam calls foul on the U.S. Cv Format. military's rosy Vietnam claims In October 1963, President John F. Research. Kennedy was so upset about David Halberstam’s reporting from essay Saigon that he asked Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, the publisher of The New York Times , to transfer David Halberstam out of Vietnam. Paper Research. Since the previous year, Halberstam had offered dogged and skeptical coverage of U.S. government officials’ optimistic portrayals of their and the South Vietnamese government’s efforts against North Vietnam. “The job of the architecture reporters in Vietnam,” Halberstam wrote in 1965, “was to report the news, whether or not the news was good for America.” In 1964, Halberstam earned a Pulitzer Prize for his Vietnam reporting. 1969: Seymour Hersh exposes the My Lai massacre and cover-up In March 1968, U.S. Army soldiers massacred hundreds of civilians in paper, My Lai, a South Vietnamese village. In the months following, Army commanders downplayed the incident, keeping it hidden from the public. However, due to pressure on the chain-of-command from a soldier in the infantry company involved, Lieutenant William Calley, Jr. was court martialed in September 1969 for his role. The public wouldn't learn of cv format My Lai until Hersh, acting on a tip, interviewed Calley and his lawyer. Hersh's story was published by Dispatch, a small news agency with a tiny staff, and argument paper then picked up nationally. Cv Format. Calley was the only soldier convicted in relation to the massacre. Hersh won the 1970 Pulitzer Prize for his reporting. 1971: The Pentagon Papers leaked and argument paper published.

In 1971, with the Vietnam War still going after almost a decade, a military analyst named Daniel Ellsberg leaked a seven-thousand page history of U.S.-Vietnam relations that had been prepared for for the crucible elizabeth internal use by paper research, the Pentagon. Data Android. Lengthy sections of argument research these “Pentagon Papers” were published in The Washington Post and essays The New York Times , revealing the covert origins of a war that was exceedingly unpopular at home. Argument. The Nixon administration ordered the newspapers to cease publication of any of the documents. By Einstein. This led to a Supreme Court case ( New York Times Co. Argument Paper Research. v. United States ) that eventually ruled in favor of the press. 1972: Woodward and Bernstein expose the Watergate break in In June 1972, five men were arrested for breaking into the Democratic National Committee offices at the Watergate Complex in data installer android texttospeech, Washington, DC.

Two young reporters at The Washington Post , Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, were intrigued that one of the paper research burglars was on the payroll of statement crucible proctor President Richard Nixon’s reelection committee and began digging further. Woodward and Bernstein uncovered a series of political crimes and “dirty tricks” that connected the burglary back to the White House. Their reporting led to indictments of 40 administration officials and the eventual resignation of President Nixon. The paper won the 1973 Pulitzer Prize for the investigative reporting. 1992: Florence Graves reveals sexual misconduct in Congress In 1992, shortly after the Anita Hill controversy, Florence Graves, founder of Common Cause magazine, began an investigation into sexual misconduct on Capitol Hill.

She quickly found a pattern of charges pointing to argument paper research, Senator Bob Packwood. In the fall of 1992, The Washington Post published Graves'story detailing allegations from 10 women of sexual misconduct by the Oregon senator. The story not only led to the first-ever Senate Ethics Committee investigation of sexual misconduct and the eventual resignation of Senator Packwood, but also to the passage of the landmark Congressional Accountability Act, subjecting Congress to the same discrimination laws as the rest of the nation. 2010: Dana Priest and William Arkin detail secret government organizations On July 19, 2010, Washington Post reporters Dana Priest and William Arkin published “Top Secret America,” a series of investigative articles revealing the massive and what they characterized as mismanaged post-9/11 growth of the U.S. intelligence community. The series, benefiting from the work of more than a dozen other journalists at The Post , compiled hundreds of thousands of records over two years, identifying 45 government organizations (1,271 sub-units) and 1,931 private companies engaged in top-secret intelligence work. The series highlighted the oversight challenges facing such a fast-growing and secretive system with such an important agenda: maintaining the safety of American citizens. Reuters/Jason Reed JIR.

2013: The Washington Post and The Guardian report on essays NSA surveillance In early June 2013, The Post and The Guardian broke nearly-simultaneous stories about National Security Agency surveillance activities being conducted on U.S. citizens and foreign officials. Paper. Both sets of articles, led by Barton Gellman at The Post and Glenn Greenwald at The Guardian , along with Laura Poitras and Ewan MacAskill, initially relied on a confidential source who was a former NSA analyst and then-employee at a private sector consulting firm. The source had told Gellman that he was operating out of essay conclusion conscience and paper knew that he would be exposed. That person was Edward Snowden. Both newspapers shared the Pulitzer Prize this year for cv format their articles.

Washington Post reporters Carl Bernstein (center) and Bob Woodward (left), the team who broke the Watergate story. Washington, D.C., 1974. © Wayne Miller/Magnum Photos. T he golden era had its shortcomings, to be sure. A herd mentality too often prevailed, especially in argument paper research, Washington coverage. Self-important journalists were too common. And both the conventional wisdom and conventional attitudes remained strong. So, for example, when confronted by a story like the AIDS epidemic, the thesis for the crucible elizabeth proctor great news organizations reacted slowly and clumsily. Few journalists paid serious attention to the rising disparities in American society.

Toward the end of the era, in the first years of the 21st century, the news media succumbed to the national anxieties produced by the 9/11 attacks and argument paper research failed to challenge effectively the Bush administration's rush to cv format, war in argument paper, Iraq. Of Media In Public Life. Many journalists joined the rush. Paper. This was an embarrassment for our major journalistic institutions and a disservice to the country. Nevertheless, America's best news organizations have proved their value again and cv format again, even in recent years, as their fortunes have declined. The culture of journalistic skepticism born in the 1960s and 1970s has continued to serve the paper country well. Essays By Einstein. Repeatedly, journalists have broken significant news stories that government officials hoped would never be revealed, from research accounts of Americans torturing terror suspects to revelations of the systematic mistreatment of veterans at Walter Reed Hospital; from accounts of the government's eavesdropping programs to descriptions of its vast, post-9/11 intelligence apparatus. The major journalistic revelations of the last decade altered the cv format country's image of argument paper research itself. Speechsynthesis Data. They mattered.

And society has benefited in less tangible ways, too. “How would this look on the front page of The Washington Post ?” has been a question asked in paper, offices in by einstein, Washington ever since the time of Watergate, to argument paper, good effect. Of course this deterrent to gothic architecture conclusion, illegal, unethical, or embarrassing behavior is unevenly effective; many miscreant public officials have ignored it, and argument will in the future, whether or not there continues to be a front page of of media life The Washington Post . But this sense of accountability has had a salutary effect. The best journalism has most often been produced by argument paper, those news organizations that have both the resources and the courage to defend their best work when it offends or alarms powerful institutions and individuals. The public may perceive journalism as an individualistic enterprise carried out by lone rangers of essay on role in public rectitude, but this is rarely the case. The best work is usually done by a team that has the backing of an organization committed to paper, maintaining the highest standards of architecture essay seriousness and integrity, and to nurturing talented reporters and editors. In the trickiest realms of investigative reporting on matters that touch on “national security,” the team—including the writers and editors as well as the lawyers and often the publisher too—can be critically important.

News organizations that can afford to argument, support such teams are now at risk. A healthy democratic society requires referees—authority figures with whistles they can blow when they perceive infringements of the rules. Prosecutors and judges fulfill this role in for the crucible, matters of law enforcement, but their writ is limited by argument paper, the scope of the law. “I am not a crook,” insisted Richard Nixon, and thesis statement crucible elizabeth perhaps he wasn't, but he was a kind of political criminal nevertheless, and he was first called to account by journalists. Will such whistle blowers be on the job to confront the next Nixon? Paul Starr, the argument research distinguished Princeton scholar, has put the matter succinctly: “By undermining the speechsynthesis installer economic basis of professional reporting and by fragmenting the public, [the digital revolution] has weakened the ability of the argument press to act as an effective agent of public accountability. If we take seriously the idea that an independent press serves an essential democratic function, its institutional distress may weaken democracy itself. And that is the danger that confronts us.” Bill O'Reilly vs. Jon Stewart 2012: The Rumble In The Air-Conditioned Auditorium at George Washington University on October 6, 2012.

Jamie McCarthy/Getty Images for cv format The Rumble 2012. I f today's providers of the argument paper research best journalism—often referred to these days, somewhat ominously, as “legacy media,” meaning the old stuff—cannot survive their continuing tribulations, what will take their place? Predicting the future is a fool's errand, but some trends are clear. The Internet promotes fragmentation by encouraging the development of like-minded communities, from you and your Facebook friends to architecture essay conclusion, avid Tea Party supporters who love Breitbart News, a highly readable, relentlessly ideological right-wing news site. Argument Paper. Surveys by speechsynthesis data texttospeech, the Pew Research Center for the People the research Press show that increasing numbers of American get their “news” from cv format ideologically congenial sources. The news media are fragmenting just as American society is argument paper research, fragmenting—by class, by region, by religious inclination, by generation, by ethnic identity, by on how education key to a successful, politics and more. The rise of the argument paper research fragmented news media is quite a recent phenomenon. Architecture Essay. It really became significant after the inauguration of Barack Obama in January 2009. President Obama came into argument paper research, the White House in the midst of the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression. He had run as a unifier who would bring a new era of bipartisan collaboration: “Yes we can!” But no, he couldn't. Republicans in Congress decided at the outset of his administration that they would try to deny the new president any victories.

Obama's early legislative successes, based on the big Democratic majorities in the House and Senate produced by the 2008 election, disguised the fact that partisan gridlock lay just around the corner. After 2010, when Republicans regained control of the House, the gridlock set in. The politicians made an essays written by einstein, uneasy peace with the idea of perpetual partisan warfare. Voters also took increasingly ideological positions, and looked with increasing suspicion on those who disagreed with them. Today's politicians, especially on the right, communicate to research, “their” voters through “their” media, most notably, of course, Fox News. Similarly, liberal Democrats like to appear on MSNBC. More ideological politicians like a world without Cronkites—without recognized gatekeepers and arbiters. So “the news” that once helped unify the country is now just another source of division.

Daniel Patrick Moynihan used to argue that “everyone is gothic essay conclusion, entitled to his own opinion, but not to paper, his own facts.” No longer. Politicians and commentators now seem perfectly happy inventing their own reality when it suits their political or ideological purposes. Fox News's determination to ridicule the Affordable Care Act—”Obamacare”—had nothing to do with traditional journalistic truth-seeking. Rather, it was part of a propaganda campaign. The MSNBC cable network, part of installer android NBC, which used to be a serious news organization, saw a business opportunity in making itself a liberal alternative to Fox, the most profitable cable news network, and now unabashedly propagates a liberal view of the news. Fox and research MSNBC have both decided to cater to written by einstein, their audiences not with original reporting of the news (which is expensive), but with commentary on the news interspersed with broadcasts of set-piece events like presidential news conferences. Curiously, or revealingly, there is argument paper research, little outrage in the culture about statement for the crucible elizabeth these developments. Argument Paper. We seem to have adapted to the demise of the old expectations about accuracy, fairness, and reporting without much of a fight. Some of the new online products produce interesting and informative journalism, but none has the ambitions or the sense of responsibility of the best publications. They couldn't afford those luxuries. Speechsynthesis Texttospeech. A great news organization is expensive.

The newsroom of The New York Times costs about $230 million a year. Paper. The news operation of installer android The Washington Post , already substantially diminished from the argument paper height of its profitability and influence, still costs more than $90 million a year. Without the revenues to support them, newsrooms all over the country have been decimated. Newspapers employed 59,000 journalists in on role of media in public, 1989, and argument 36,000 in 2012 (and fewer since then). Once-formidable institutions including The Baltimore Sun , Chicago Tribune , Los Angeles Times , and Miami Herald are vastly diminished. Others have gone out of business altogether. The significant news organizations that have survived are under terrific pressure now. A revealing document emerged this spring from The New York Times , a 96-page report written by thesis for the crucible, a committee of Times employees on research the digital future. Reading it makes clear the extent to which even Times reporters and editors now see the demands of the digital age as incompatible with their traditional pursuits.

The committee argues that The New York Times must become a “digital first” organization. “That means aggressively questioning many of our print-based traditions and their demands on on role in public life our time, and determining which can be abandoned to free up resources for digital work.” One example cited in the report: “Packaging, promoting and sharing our journalism” on the Internet—three activities that have nothing to do with reporting and writing news stories—must become a priority for the newsroom. Even when journalists are allowed to pursue traditional reporting, the requirements of online journalism limit their opportunities to argument paper research, do so. Before the big papers had websites, a reporter could take all day to cover an event, talk to sources to get background information, consider the implications of the new developments, and write a story for the next day's paper. Today the same reporter has to file multiple versions of the same story as the day progresses, adding new tidbits as she acquires them. There is statement for the crucible elizabeth, much less time available to dig into a story and discover its ramifications.

The quantity of original reporting has surely declined as the argument research importance of the installer texttospeech Internet has grown. One immediate effect of all these changes and research cutbacks is that there's no paper in of media, America today that can offer the argument paper same coverage of on role of media its city, suburbs, and state that it provided 20 or even 10 years ago, and scores of city halls and state legislatures get virtually no coverage by any substantive news organizations. Television remains the primary source of news for most Americans, but local stations have dramatically reduced their reporting staffs, and the networks no longer try to cover the argument paper research world and the country as they once did. It’s true that the federal government in Washington still gets a lot of attention from reporters. But one large category of Washington coverage has virtually disappeared: journalism about members of Congress by news organizations “back home.” A generation ago scores of local newspapers and television stations employed Washington correspondents who kept an eye on the members of the House and Senate from data installer android their cities and states. Argument Research. Senator Christopher Dodd recalls that in his early years in essay on role in public, the Senate, in the 1980s, a dozen reporters from Connecticut outlets were based in Washington and reported regularly on his activities. By the time he retired in 2010, that number had fallen to zero.

No Connecticut newspaper or television station had a reporter in the nation's capital. Facade of The Newseum, incorporating the text of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. David Monack/Wikimedia Commons. A re there no grounds for optimism, or even hope? Of course there are. In this age of creative destruction, the destruction is more obvious than the creativity, but some of the new, online providers of news are doing interesting work that helps compensate for the shrinkage of traditional outlets' reporting staffs.

For example, in Connecticut there are now several bloggers reporting on the state's members of Congress, and paper CT Mirror, a non-profit news site, has a full-time Washington reporter. Around the cv format country dozens of news websites have sprung up to provide some local coverage, many of them employing their own reporters, and a few of them are quite good. There are also several web-based operations that sometimes break important national stories. Argument Research. The very best of them is essays is the future, ProPublica, a non-profit organization founded by Paul Steiger, the former managing editor of The Wall Street Journal , that is devoted to investigative reporting, an expensive specialty that has suffered in the era of disappearing newspaper profits. Argument Research. ProPublica provides pro bono journalism of the on how education highest quality, as good as the investigative projects of the major newspapers. Its budget of $12 million a year, nearly all raised from donors, funds a staff of 45 reporters and editors. But as its journalists acknowledge, the ProPublica stories that have the greatest impact are those done in collaboration with legacy news media that publish or broadcast them. Its own excellent website has a relatively small audience. AP Photo/Jason DeCrow.

Other non-profit organizations are also providing reporting at a level that only the major news organizations used to offer. The winner of the 2014 Pulitzer Prize for investigative reporting was Chris Hamby of the Center for Public Integrity in Washington, a non-profit watchdog organization that maintains vast electronic files tracing the flow of money into our politics. Marcus Brauchli, who has served as the senior editor of both The Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post , observed recently that thanks to Internet offerings, the quantity of American journalism has never been greater. It used to be the case that newspapers like the Times and Post offered their readers what was usually the very best coverage available in a wide range of news categories—there were no serious competitors. Today there are competitors in every one: ESPN in sports, Politico in paper research, Washington coverage, BuzzFeed in the world of cv format popular culture, and so on. We at argument paper, the Post used to have a corner on the market in Washington—no competitor could challenge us in cv format, any of our major categories. No corners are available now.

New York Times Building. Jleon/ Wikimedia Commons. I f there is some good news, it's hardly enough to be reassuring. Paper Research. Something more substantial has to happen to sustain the kind of cv format journalistic excellence that a democracy requires. Of course there can be technological surprises. A group of young people could be working in a Silicon Valley garage right now on argument research an idea that could re-establish a healthy revenue stream for major news organizations. I certainly hope so. Efforts to save serious journalism enjoy one natural advantage: smart people playing influential roles in society know that they need good information about many subjects.

It is conceivable that these citizens, who are a significant audience albeit a small fraction of the total population, will be willing to cv format, pay the full cost of the argument journalism they consume. At first blush this may sound painfully obvious. Don't people usually pay for gothic architecture essay conclusion the services they use? Not the paper news. Before websites, readers paid a pittance for their news in newspapers that were deliberately priced below the cost of a cup of coffee to try to maximize circulation (and therefore advertising dollars). And then for the better part of two decades—the first decades of the statement crucible World Wide Web—online consumers got used to the idea that news was not just cheap but free. Argument Paper. In the cv format United States The Wall Street Journal was the only major publication that charged for online access to its journalism. Argument Paper. Everyone else gave their work away on the theory—or hope—that this was the way to build the audiences that advertisers would eventually pay to essay on role, reach. Then in March 2011, The New York Times announced a paywall that required regular online readers to pay for its journalism, a risky gambit that has proven remarkably successful.

At the beginning of April the Times had 800,000 “digital subscribers,” people paying to argument, read the paper on electronic devices only. (The daily ink-on-paper Times is bought by 680,000 people, and 1.2 million on Sundays.) Digital subscriptions currently bring in more than $150 million a year, money that has saved the essays on how key to a successful company from the grave financial crisis caused by argument, declining revenues for the print edition. The Washington Post and most other large newspapers followed the Times , if they were not already charging for online access. Though none of the others has had as much success signing up digital subscribers as the Times , the gothic architecture essay newspaper’s ability to persuade online readers to pay is heartening. It suggests at least the possibility that over time, consumers of news might follow the path of television viewers, who once thought—before the arrival of cable television—that TV was free, but eventually got used to paying substantial monthly cable bills. Some version of that transition could save the traditional news business—if some clever inventor can figure out argument research how to make it happen. Thesis Statement Crucible. Until now no one has, and even the Times 's encouraging numbers fall short of a solution that could save its $235 million-a-year newsroom. A morning edition of the Washington Post- August 6, 2013. Amazon.com Inc founder Jeff Bezos bought the newspaper in a surprise deal that ended the Graham family's 80 years of paper research ownership. “Design the essay life electronic classifieds now.” see the argument paper full memo. L ast fall, when he met the staff of The Washington Post soon after buying the paper, Jeff Bezos of Amazon spoke about the importance of “the bundle,” as he called the variety of news, opinion, useful information, and entertainment that the Post offers each day. For The Elizabeth. The goal in the digital age, Bezos said, had to be to make the bundle attractive to a lot of people—so attractive that they would be willing to pay for it.

The average age of the paper research readers of the printed paper, Bezos noted, goes up “about one year every year.” It's no secret where that leads, he quipped. Now that he owns the money-losing Post , Bezos faces the essays written challenge of argument paper research how to sell that bundle. Michael Moritz of Sequoia Capital, one of the country's most successful venture capitalists, summarized the problem: “How [can] an Internet property, dedicated to on how future, broad-based news and information, ever generate a lot of money? Without solving that riddle, there is no path to prosperity.” Of course, a large organization offering “broad-based news and information” is not the argument paper research only conceivable model. Personally I am convinced that our society will be best served by the survival of a few distinguished news organizations committed to holding powerful people accountable for the ways they use their power.

This view is cv format, certainly a product of my lifetime's service in one such organization. Paper Research. But there are other possibilities. The news supermarkets we are used to statement crucible elizabeth proctor, may not survive, but “disaggregated” news organizations specializing in specific subjects might, over time, provide the accountability journalism we need. Research. One interesting example is the SCOTUS blog, which provides excellent coverage of the Supreme Court. It makes no profit, but is supported by Bloomberg. Politico's coverage of essays written Washington and politics, though uneven, is better than that of argument paper research any but the very best news organizations. And Politico, thanks to revenue from its Capitol Hill newspaper edition, actually makes money. It is also possible that “prosperity” won't be necessary.

The $250 million Bezos paid for The Washington Post was a tiny sliver of his $30 billion net worth. For him to cover the Post 's losses now costs the equivalent of gothic lunch money for an ordinary mortal—something Bezos could easily afford for decades to come, if he chooses to play the angel's role indefinitely. Argument Paper Research. The money-losing Boston Globe , sold at a huge loss by The New York Times in speechsynthesis data android, 2013, has a deep-pocketed new owner in John Henry, principal owner of the Boston Red Sox, who similarly could keep the paper afloat indefinitely if he wants to. There might be comparable angels in the futures of paper research other news organizations. New Yorkers have speculated for years that their former mayor, Michael Bloomberg, worth $34 billion, might play that role some day for The New York Times . The wealthiest giants in this brave new world are companies that did not exist 20 years ago, inventive outfits that have capitalized on digital technologies most effectively. Facebook and Google, for essays by einstein example, bestride the argument paper globe like modern-day King Kongs, catering to billions of crucible elizabeth proctor people and paper earning scores of billions of speechsynthesis data dollars. Both exploit the work of traditional providers of news that create information useful to Facebook friends and Google searchers. They lead large numbers of readers to the journalism of the legacy media. But they contribute relatively little to argument paper, the survival of those providers. These firms were created by a new generation of young people whose self-interest may lead them either to realize the importance of the legacy institutions, or figure out how to create new ways to do what the old news organizations did in the past.

Financially, it would be easy for Google to rescue The New York Times . The annual cost of the Times 's newsroom represents less than 2 percent of Google's 2013 profits. Google, or someone else, could also create new news organizations dedicated to statement for the crucible, excellent coverage of narrow fields. The future, in Mort Sahl's wise words, lies ahead—but remains invisible. News as we know it is at risk. So is democratic governance, which depends on paper research an effective watchdog news media. Both have been undermined by changes in society wrought by digital technologies—among the most powerful forces ever unleashed by mankind. We have barely begun the Digital Age, and there is no point in data installer android, trying to predict just where it will take us. News certainly has a future, but what that will be is unclear. All that we know for certain is that we are lighting out for new territory. Join the conversation on Twitter using #BrookingsEssay or share this on Facebook . This Essay is also available as an research, eBook from these online retailers: Amazon Kindle, Barnes Noble, Apple iTunes, Google Play, and on Kobo.

Like other products of the essays education key to future Institution, The Brookings Essay is intended to contribute to discussion and stimulate debate on important issues. The views are solely those of the author. Graphic Design: Marcia Underwood and Jessica Pavone. Research: Fred Dews, Thomas Young, Jessica Pavone, Kevin Hawkins. Editorial: Beth Rashbaum and Fred Dews.

Web Development: Marcia Underwood. 1775 Massachusetts Ave, NW, Washington , DC 20036.